« The War on Boys: Where Feminists and Men’s Rights Activists Go Wrong | Main | Ireland: Every Time I Try to Get Out, They Pull Me Back In »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54eeb1431883400e55374f6d08833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Daily Mail: White boy, 12, suspected of being Islamic extremist recruit after he showed beheading videos to classmates :
Daily Mail: White boy, 12, suspected of being Islamic extremist recruit after he showed beheading videos to classmates
By Selwyn Duke
It's now well-known that the mainstream media studiously avoids identifying the race or ethnicity of criminals or terrorists. When Moslems riot, for instance, usually absent from articles on the subject is any reference to the religious classification of the rioters. Used instead is a characterization such as the generic "youths." "Two-hundred 'youths' rioted in protest of police measures," a paper may write. I have found an interesting exception to this practice, however, in a Daily Mail article in which they seem to take pains to identify a terrorist suspect as a white, "fair-haired" lad.
Now, I've come to a realization. Why should I insist on walking up the down staircase? Why should I languish in the alternative media -- where pay and exposure are lower -- when simple formulaic devotion to a politically-correct creed is all that's necessary to be a mainstream-media success story? Besides, I really think I could do a better job of rendering politically-correct reportage than the unidentified individual who wrote the piece in question. To prove this, I will illustrate how I would re-write the story. (What follows is an excerpt of the article with my additions.)
The title is fine, so I'd retain it.
So there you have it. Daily Mail, New York Times, Washington Post, et al., take note. I could be your fair-haired boy.
Posted at 11:46 AM in Humor, Islam, Media, Politics, Race & Ethnicity, Satire, Snap Commentary | Permalink